4.2 Article

An unusual halotolerant α-type carbonic anhydrase from the alga Dunaliella salina functionally expressed in Escherichia coli

期刊

PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 151-157

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S1046-5928(02)00683-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 60-kDa, salt-inducible, internally duplicated alpha-type carbonic anhydrase (Dca) is associated with the plasma membrane of the extremely salt-tolerant, unicellular, green alga Dunaliella salina. Unlike other carbonic anhydrases, Dca remains active over a very broad range of salinities (0-4 M NaCl), thus representing a novel type of extremely halotolerant enzyme. To elucidate the structural principles of halotolerance, structure-function investigations of Dca have been initiated. Such studies require considerable amounts of the enzyme, and hence, large-scale algal cultivation. Furthermore, the purified enzyme is often contaminated with other, co-purifying algal carbonic anhydrases. Expression in heterologous systems offers a means to produce, and subsequently purify, sufficiently large amounts of Dca required for activity and structural studies. Attempts to over-express Dca in the Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)pLysS strain, after optimizing various expression parameters, produced soluble, but weakly active protein, composed of fully reduced and variably -S-S- cross-linked chains (each of the Dca repeats contains a pair of cysteine residues, presumably forming a disulfide bond). However, when the E. coli Origami B(DE3)pLysS strain was used as a host, a functionally active enzyme with proper disulfide bonds was formed in good yield. Affinity-purified recombinant Dca resembled the native enzyme from D. salina in activity and salt tolerance. Hence, this expression system offers a means of pursuing detailed studies of this extraordinary protein using biochemical, biophysical, and crystallographic approaches. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据