3.8 Article

Trap position and fruit presence affect visual responses of apple maggot flies (Dipt., Tephritidae) to different trap types

出版社

BLACKWELL VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0418.2003.00700.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compared responses of apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh), in a commercial apple orchard in Massachusetts with three different types of visual traps baited with synthetic fruit volatiles. The traps were red spheres, Ladd traps (a rectangular yellow panel between two red hemispheres) and rectangular yellow panels. Traps were placed either in optimal position (Drummond, F.; Groden, E.; Prokopy, R. J., 1984: Environ. Entomol. 13, 232-235.) or sub-optimal position (not surrounded by foliage and fruit from all sides). The study was performed over 3 years. Early in the fruiting season, when apples were small and green, red spheres followed by Ladd traps attracted more flies than yellow panels. Ladd traps were the most sensitive to trap positioning, losing effectiveness when placed in sub-optimal position. Late in the fruiting season, in years yielding crops of large red apples, red spheres in optimal position (surrounded by growing red fruit) lost some effectiveness relative to Ladd traps in optimal position. Red spheres in sub-optimal position were not similarly affected, perhaps because of the lack of fruit in the background. Red sphere performance relative to Ladd traps was re-established after removal of competing fruit from trees at harvest. Because Ladd traps are more expensive to purchase and more difficult to position, red spheres are a better option for commercial growers in eastern North America. Conceivably, loss of capturing power of red spheres because of visual competition from red apples towards harvest could be mitigated by adjusting trap positioning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据