4.7 Article

Treatment of children with nonmetastatic paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: Results of the malignant mesenchymal tumors studies (MMT 84 and MMT 89) of the international society of pediatric oncology

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 793-798

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.040

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To report the results of the Malignant Mesenchymal Tumors studies (MMT 84 and 89) of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) in males with nonmetastatic paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. Patients and Methods: From 1984 to 1994, 96 males were treated in SIOP protocols. Radical inguinal orchidectomy was recommended, but initial retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was not performed. Disease was staged according to the SIOP tumor-node-metastasis staging system. Treatment was stratified by stage. In the MMT 89 study, males with completely resected tumors at diagnosis received less chemotherapy (vincristine and dactinomycin) than patients in the MMT 84 study (ifosfamide, vincristine, and dactinomycin). Results: Median age at diagnosis was 65 months. Thirty-one tumors were larger than 5 cm, and 13 males were older than 10 years with a tumor larger than 5 cm. At a median follow-up of 7 years, 87 patients were alive; 79 were in first complete remission and eight were in second complete remission. Relapse occurred in 16 patients (17%). At 5 years, the overall survival (OS) rate was 92%, with an event-free survival (EFS) rate of 82%. OS and EFS were significantly worse for males with tumors greater than 5 cm and for males older than 10 years at diagnosis. Conclusion: Males with paratesticular RMS have an excellent prognosis except for a selected group of patients older than 10 years or with tumor greater than 5 cm. Intensified chemotherapy incorporating alkylating agents for this subgroup may be preferred to the use of systematic lymphadenectomy to improve survival while minimizing the burden of therapy. (C) 2003 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据