4.7 Article

The diagonal Born-Oppenheimer correction beyond the Hartree-Fock approximation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 118, 期 9, 页码 3921-3927

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1540626

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on evaluation of the diagonal Born-Oppenheimer correction (DBOC) to the electronic energy with Hartree-Fock (HF) and conventional correlated wave functions for general molecular systems. Convergence of both HF and configuration interaction (CI) DBOC with the one-particle basis seems to be rather fast, with triple-zeta quality correlation consistent sets of Dunning sufficiently complete to approach the respective basis set limits for the DBOC of the ground state of H-2 within 0.1 cm(-1). Introduction of electron correlation via the CI singles and doubles method has a substantial effect on the absolute value of the DBOC for H-2, H2O, and BH in their ground states (ca. +13 cm(-1) out of 115 cm(-1), +22 cm(-1) out of 622 cm(-1), and +11 cm(-1) out of 370 cm(-1), respectively). The effect of the correlation correction to the DBOC on relative energies is small, e.g., the barrier to linearity of water changes by ca. 1 cm(-1); however, the value is difficult to converge to the ab initio limit. Based on recent results by Schwenke [J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 2352 (2001)] and our findings, we expect the correlation correction to the DBOC to have a substantial effect on spectroscopic properties of the ground state of water. The effect of DBOC on equilibrium bond distance r(e) and harmonic vibrational frequency omega(e) of the ground state of BH is +0.0007 Angstrom and -2 cm(-1), respectively. Surprisingly, the former is a much larger change than expected, and greater than errors due to residual incompleteness of electron correlation treatment and basis set in state-of-the-art conventional Born-Oppenheimer computations. The effect of using a correlated wave function for the DBOC evaluation on the above corrections to r(e) and omega(e) is small. (C) 2003 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据