4.7 Article

Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 577-584

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04694-0

关键词

conception; early pregnancy loss; time to clinical pregnancy; human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG); prospective study

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P01 ES06198, ES-00002, 1R01 ES11682, 1R01 ES08337] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To examine rates of conception and pregnancy loss and their relations with time to clinical pregnancy and reproductive outcomes. Design: A prospective observational study. Setting: Population-based cohort in China. Patient(s): Five hundred eighteen healthy newly married women who intended to conceive. Upon stopping contraception, daily records of vaginal bleeding and daily first-morning urine specimens were obtained for less than or equal to1 year or until a clinical pregnancy was achieved. Daily urinary hCG was assayed to detect early pregnancy loss (EPL). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Conception, pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy. Result(s): The conception rate per cycle was 40% over the first 12 months. Of the 618 detectable conceptions, 49 (7.9%) ended in clinical spontaneous abortion, and 152 (24.6%) in EPL. Early pregnancy loss was detected in 14% of all the cycles without clinically recognized pregnancy, but the frequencies were lower among women with delayed time to clinical pregnancy. Early pregnancy loss in the preceding cycle was associated with increased odds of conception (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-3.9), clinical pregnancy (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.0), and EPL (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.2) but was not associated with spontaneous abortion, low birth weight, or preterm birth in the subsequent cycle. Conclusion(s): We demonstrated substantial EPL in the non-clinically pregnant cycles and a positive relation between EPL and subsequent fertility. (Fertil Steril((R)) 2003;79:577-94. (C) 2003 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据