4.7 Article

Increased muscle proteasome activity correlates with disease severity in gastric cancer patients

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 237, 期 3, 页码 384-389

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200303000-00013

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate the state of activation of the ATP-ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic system in the skeletal muscle of gastric cancer patients. Summary Background Data Muscle wasting in experimental cancer cachexia is frequently associated with hyperactivation of the ATP-dependent ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic system. Increased muscle ubiquitin mRNA levels have been previously shown in gastric cancer patients, suggesting that this proteolytic system might be modulated also in human cancer. Methods Biopsies of the rectus abdominis muscle were obtained intra-operatively from 23 gastric cancer patients and 14 subjects undergoing surgery for benign abdominal diseases, and muscle ubiquitin mRNA expression and proteasome proteolytic activities were assessed. Results Muscle ubiquitin mRNA was hyperexpressed in gastric cancer patients compared to controls. In parallel, three proteasome proteolytic activities (CTL, chymotrypsin-like; TL, trypsin-like; PGP, peptidyl-glutamyl-peptidase) significantly increased in gastric cancer patients with respect to controls. Advanced tumor stage, poor nutritional status, and age more than 50 years were associated with significantly higher CTL activity but had no influence on TL and PGP activity. Conclusions These results confirm the involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic system in the pathogenesis of muscle protein hypercatabolism in cancer cachexia. The observation that perturbations of this pathway in gastric cancer patients occur even before clinical evidence of body wasting supports the thinking that specific pharmacologic and metabolic approaches aimed at counteracting the upregulation of this pathway should be undertaken as early as cancer is diagnosed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据