4.8 Article

Oral health and peripheral arterial disease

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 107, 期 8, 页码 1152-1157

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000051456.68470.C8

关键词

peripheral vascular disease; infection; periodontitis; tooth loss

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-55075] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-35464] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE-12102] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Many studies have reported the association between poor oral health and coronary heart disease or stroke, but few of them evaluated peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Hence, in this study we examined the associations between oral health and PAD. Methods and Results-In the prospective study of 45 136 eligible male health professionals free of cardiovascular diseases at baseline, we identified 342 cases of PAD during a 12-year follow-up period. We evaluated the association between different measures of oral diseases and the occurrence of PAD. Baseline number of teeth was not related to the risk of PAD, but cumulative incident tooth loss was significantly associated with elevated risk of subsequent occurrence of PAD. The relative risk for history of periodontal disease was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.77) and for any tooth loss during the follow-up period was 1.39 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.82), controlling for traditional risk factors of cardiovascular disease. Among men with a history of periodontal diseases, the relative risk of tooth loss increased to 1.88 (95% CI, 1.27 to 2.77), whereas no association was found between tooth loss and PAD among those without periodontal diseases (RF, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.38). We further explored the potential induction period of tooth loss and found that tooth loss in the previous 2 to 6 years was most strongly associated with PAD. Conclusions-We found that incident tooth loss was significantly associated with PAD, especially among men with periodontal diseases. The results support a potential oral infection-inflammation pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据