4.8 Article

Activation of ERK1/2 by ΔRaf-1 : ER* represses bim expression independently of the JNK or PI3K pathways

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 1281-1293

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206261

关键词

apoptosis; bim; ERK; Raf; JNK; PI3K

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/B/0000C199, BBS/E/B/0000H457] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/B/0000H457, BBS/E/B/0000C199] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CC139 fibroblasts are one of several model systems in which the Raf --> MEK --> ERK1/2 pathway can inhibit apoptosis independently of the PI3K pathway; however, the precise mechanism for this protective effect is not known. Serum withdrawal from CC139 fibroblasts resulted in the rapid onset of apoptosis, which was prevented by actinomycin D or cycloheximide. Serum withdrawal promoted the rapid, de novo accumulation of BiMEL, a proapoptotic 'BH3-only' member of the Bcl-2 protein family. BiMEL expression was an early event, occurring several hours prior to caspase activation. In contrast to studies in neurons, activation of the JNK - cJun pathway was neither necessary nor sufficient to induce BiMEL expression. Selective inhibition of either the ERK pathway (with U0126) or the PI3K pathway (with LY294002) caused an increase in the expression of BiMEL. Furthermore, selective activation of the ERK1/2 pathway by DeltaRaf-1:ER*:ER* substantially reduced BiMEL expression, abolished conformational changes in Bax and blocked the appearance of apoptotic cells. The ability of DeltaRaf-1:ER* to repress Bim(EL) expression required the ERK pathway but was independent of the PI3K --> PDK --> PKB pathway. Thus, serum withdrawal-induced expression of BiMEL occurs independently of the JNK --> c-Jun pathway and can be repressed by the ERK pathway independently of the PI3K pathway. This may contribute to Raf- and Ras-induced cell survival at low serum concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据