4.6 Article

Spatial and seasonal variations in CCN distribution and the aerosol-CCN relationship over southern Africa

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2002JD002384

关键词

cloud condensation nuclei; CCN; aerosols; biomass burning; industrial emissions; southern Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] The sources and transport of cloud condensation nuclei ( CCN) over southern Africa have been investigated using in situ measurements collected during the Aerosol Recirculation and Rainfall Experiment ( ARREX) wet season projects and during the Southern African Regional Science Initiative ( SAFARI- 2000) intensive dry season campaign. CCN concentrations over the subcontinent are generally higher in the dry season than in the wet season and exceed 2000 cm(-3) in highly polluted air masses. In the late dry season, CCN concentrations are highest in the northern regions of the subcontinent due to the burning of savanna biomass. Emissions from industries and power plants on the South African Highveld are a prolific year- round source of CCN and are sufficient to account for CCN levels south of 20 degreesS throughout the year. Most CCN are contained within the mixing layer, which extends to an altitude of 3000 - 4000 m over the plateau and is capped by a temperature inversion. Multiple inversions and absolutely stable layers control the stratification of aerosols and CCN. Biomass burning particles are efficient CCN, and the median diameter of the accumulation mode is large ( up to 0.19 mm). Recently emitted industrial aerosols are less soluble and have a smaller median diameter ( 0.11 mum). Twice as many aerosols act as CCN in the dry season ( 68%) than in the wet season ( 34%). The fraction is highest in the dry season over the tropical regions (> 80%), where smoke aerosol predominates. Elevated aerosol and CCN concentrations are expected to have implications for direct radiative forcing, especially in the dry season, and for indirect forcing in the wet season.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据