4.7 Article

The nuclear accretion in the FR I radio galaxy IC 4296 from Chandra and very long baseline array observations

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 585, 期 2, 页码 677-686

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/346184

关键词

galaxies : active; galaxies : individual (IC 4296); galaxies : jets; galaxies : nuclei; radio continuum : galaxies; X-rays : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high angular resolution study of the nucleus of the FR I galaxy IC 4296 using Chandra ACIS-S and VLBA observations is presented, with the aim of studying the nature of the accretion process. Pointlike and hard X-ray emission is found, well described by a moderately absorbed power law of Gamma = 1.48(-0.34)(+0.42) no iron fluorescence line from cold material is detected. The 0.3-10 keV luminosity is 2.4 x 10(41) ergs s(-1), which is similar to400 times lower than the accretion luminosity resulting from the estimated Bondi mass accretion rate and a radiative efficiency of 10%. On the parsec scale, a jet and a counterjet extend out from a central unresolved core in the 8.4 GHz image. Their orientation is in good agreement with that of the large-scale jets, and their bulk speed is relativistic. The parsec-scale spectrum is convex over 2-22 GHz. The observed nuclear luminosity is not likely to be reconciled with the accretion luminosity by assuming that Compton thick material surrounds the nucleus. Low radiative efficiency accretion flow models (ADAF and its variants) cannot account for the observed emission and spectral shape of the nucleus in the radio band. The power in the jets accounts for a sizable fraction (greater than or similar to10%) of the accretion luminosity; therefore, the mass accretion rate need not be much different from the estimate obtained using Bondi's theory. A jet-dominated origin also for the observed radiative losses of the nucleus is suggested. This could also explain the finding that a nuclear luminosity orders of magnitude lower than that of normal radio-loud AGNs is accompanied by a relatively higher radio emission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据