4.6 Review

Neuregulins: functions, forms, and signaling strategies

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 284, 期 1, 页码 14-30

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-4827(02)00102-7

关键词

neuregulin; acetylcholine receptor-inducing activity; glial growth factor; heregulin; neu differentiation factor; sensory and motor neuron-derived factor; ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase; schizophrenia; neuromuscular synapse; cell-cell signaling proteins; juxtacrine signaling; paracrine signaling; transmembrane ligands; proteolytic process; shredding

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM56337] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neuregulins (NRGs) are cell-cell signaling proteins that are ligands for receptor tyrosine kinases of the ErbB family. The neuregulin family of genes has four members: NRG1, NRG2, NRG3, and NRG4. Relatively little is known about the biological functions of the NRG2, 3, and 4 proteins, and they are considered in this review only briefly. The NRG1 proteins play essential roles in the nervous system, heart, and breast. There is also evidence for involvement of NRG signaling in the development and function of several other organ systems, and in human disease, including the pathogenesis of schizophrenia and breast cancer. There are many NRG1 isoforms, raising the question Why so many neuregulins? Study of mice with targeted mutations (knockout mice) has demonstrated that isoforms differing in their N-terminal region or in their epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain differ in their in vivo functions. These differences in function might arise because of differences in expression pattern or might reflect differences in intrinsic biological characteristics. While differences in expression pattern certainly contribute to the observed differences in in vivo functions, there are also marked differences in intrinsic characteristics that may tailor isoforms for specific signaling requirements, a theme that will be emphasized in this review. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据