4.8 Article

Stromal cell-derived factor-1 effects on ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cell recruitment for ischemic neovascularization

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 107, 期 9, 页码 1322-1328

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000055313.77510.22

关键词

chemokines; angiogenesis; ischemia; endothelium

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL60911, HL57516, HL53354] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) is a chemokine considered to play an important role in the trafficking of hematopoietic stem cells. Given the close relationship between hematopoietic stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), we investigated the effect of SDF-1 on EPC-mediated vasculogenesis. Methods and Results-Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated expression of CXCR4, the receptor of SDF-1, by 66+/-3% of EPCs after 7 days in culture. In vitro modified Boyden chamber assay showed a dose-dependent EPC migration toward SDF-1 (control versus 10 ng/mL SDF-1 versus 100 ng/mL SDF-1, 24+/-2 versus 71+/-3 versus 140+/-6 cells/mm(2); P<0.0001). SDF-1 attenuated EPC apoptosis (control versus SDF-1, 27+/-1 versus 7+/-1%; P<0.0001). To investigate the effect of SDF-1 in vivo, we locally injected SDF-1 into athymic ischemic hindlimb muscle of nude mice combined with human EPC transplantation to determine whether SDF-1 augmented EPC-induced vasculogenesis. Fluorescence microscopic examination disclosed increased local accumulation of fluorescence-labeled EPCs in ischemic muscle in the SDF-1 treatment group (control versus SDF-1=241+/-25 versus 445+/-24 cells/mm(2), P<0.0001). At day 28 after treatment, ischemic tissue perfusion was improved in the SDF-1 group and capillary density was also increased. (control versus SDF-1, 355+/-26 versus 551+/-30 cells/mm(2); P<0.0001). Conclusion-These findings indicate that locally delivered SDF-1 augments vasculogenesis and subsequently contributes to ischemic neovascularization in vivo by augmenting EPC recruitment in ischemic tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据