4.6 Article

Phylogenetic relationships of non-mitochondrial nucleotide transport proteins in bacteria and eukaryotes

期刊

GENE
卷 306, 期 -, 页码 27-35

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00429-3

关键词

intracellular bacteria; nucleotide transporter; nucleotide metabolism

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-15035] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current knowledge about the nucleotide metabolism of intracellular bacteria is very limited. Here we report on the identification of nucleotide transport proteins (NTT) of two obligate endoparasites, Caedibacter caryophila and Holospora obtusa, both alpha-proteobacteria, which reside in the vegetative macronucleus of Paramecium caudatum. For comparative studies, we also identified the first nucleotide transporter in chloroplasts of a red alga, i.e. Galdieria sulphuraria, and further homologs in plant chloroplasts. Heterologous expression of the NTT proteins from C. caryophila, H. obtusa, and G. sulphuraria in Escherichia coli demonstrate that the nucleotide influx mediated by these transporters is specific for ATP and ADP. The NTT proteins of C. caryophila and H. obtusa exhibit substantial sequence identity with their counterparts in chloroplasts and intracellular bacterial pathogens of humans, but not with the nucleotide transport system of mitochondria. Comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of bacterial and chloroplast NTT proteins showed that homologs in chloroplasts from plants, and green, red, stramenopile and glaucocystophyte algae are monophyletic. In contrast, the evolutionary relationships of the bacterial counterparts appear highly complex. In the presented phylogeny, NTT proteins of C. caryophila and H. obtusa are only distantly related to one another, although these two taxa are close relatives in 16S rRNA trees. The tree topology indicates that some bacterial NTT paralogs have arisen by gene duplications and others by horizontal transfer. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据