4.7 Review

Stretch-elicited Na+/H+ exchanger activation:: the autocrine/paracrine loop and its mechanical counterpart

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 4, 页码 953-960

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6363(02)00768-X

关键词

angiotensin; endothelins; Na/Ca-exchanger; Na/H-exchanger; stretch/m-e coupling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stretch of the cardiac muscle is immediately followed by an increase in the contraction strength after which occurs a slow force increase (SFR) that takes several minutes to fully develop. The SFR was detected in a wide variety of experimental preparations including isolated myocytes, papillary muscles and/or trabeculae, left ventricle strips of failing human myocardium, in vitro isovolumic and in vivo volume-loaded hearts. It was established that the initial increase in force is due to an increase in myofilament Ca2+ responsiveness, whereas the SFR results from an increase in the Ca2+ transient. However, the mechanism(s) for this increase in the Ca2+ transient has remained undefined until the proposal of Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE) activation by stretch. Studies in multicellular cardiac muscle preparations from cat, rabbit, rat and failing human heart have shown evidence that the stretch induces a rise in intracellular Na+ ([Na+](i)) through NHE activation, which subsequently leads to an increase in Ca2+ transient via reverse-mode Na+/Ca2+ (NCX) exchange. These experimental data agree with a theoretical ionic model of cardiomyocytes that predicted an increased Na+ influx and a concurrent increase in Ca2+ entry through NCX as the cause of the SFR to muscle stretch. However, there are aspects that await definitive demonstration, and perhaps subjected to species-related differences like the possibility of an autocrine/paracrine loop involving angiotensin II and endothelin as the underlying mechanism for stretch-induced NHE activation leading to the rise in [Na+](i) and reverse-mode NCX. (C) 2003 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据