4.6 Article

Role for the cholecystokinin-A receptor in fever: a study of a mutant rat strain and a pharmacological analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 547, 期 3, 页码 941-949

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.033183

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS041233, R01 NS-41233] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The involvement of the cholecystokinin (CCK)-A receptor in fever was studied. The polyphasic febrile responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 10 mug kg(-1), i.v.) were compared between wild-type Long-Evans (LE) rats and the CCK-A-receptor-deficient Otsuka LE Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats. The response of the wild-type rats was biphasic, which is typical for LE rats. Phases I and 2 of the response of the OLETF rats were similar to those of the LE rats, but the OLETF rats also developed a robust phase 3. This late enhancement of the febrile response could reflect either the absence of the A receptor per se or a secondary trait of the mutant strain. To distinguish between these possibilities, we conducted a pharmacological analysis. We studied whether the normally low phase 3 of LE rats can be enhanced by a CCK-A-receptor antagonist, sodium lorglumide (4.3 mug kg(-1) min(-1), 120 min, i.v.), and whether the normally high phase 3 of Wistar rats can be attenuated by a CCK-A receptor agonist, sulphated CCK-8 (up to 0.17 mug kg(-1) min(-1), 120 min, i.v.). The dose of sodium lorglumide used was sufficient to increase food intake (to block satiety), but it did not affect the fever response. In both febrile and afebrile rats, CCK-8 induced dose-dependent skin vasodilatation and decreased body temperature, but it failed to produce any effects specific for phase 3. We conclude that the exaggeration of phase 3 in OLETF rats reflects a secondary trait of this strain and not the lack of the CCK-A receptor per se. None of the three known phases of the febrile response of rats to LPS requires the CCK-A receptor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据