4.6 Article

Deamination of 5-methylcytosines within cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers is an important component of UVB mutagenesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 278, 期 12, 页码 10314-10321

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M212696200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES06070] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UVB mutagenesis is characterized by an abundance of C --> T and 5-methylcytosine --> T transitions at dipyrimidine sequences. It is not known how these mutations might arise. One hypothesis is that UV-induced mutations occur only after deamination of the cytosine or 5-methylcytosine within the pyrimidine dimer. It is not clear how methylation of cytosines at the 5-position influences deamination and how this affects mutagenesis. We have now conducted experiments with a CpG-methylated supF shuttle vector that was irradiated with UVB and then incubated at 37 degreesC to allow time for deamination before passage through a human cell line to establish mutations. This led to a significantly increased frequency of CC --> TT mutations and of transition mutations at 5'-PymCG-3' sequences. A spectrum of deaminated cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in the supF gene was determined using the mismatch glycosylase activities of MBD4 protein in combination with ligation-mediated PCR. Methylation at the C-5 position promoted the deamination of cytosines within cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, and these two events combined led to a significantly increased frequency of UVB-induced transition mutations at 5'-PymCG-3' sequences. Under these conditions, the majority of all supF mutations were transition mutations at 5'-PymCG-3', and they clustered at several mutational hot spots. Exactly these types of mutations are frequently observed in the p53 gene of nonmelanoma skin tumors. This particular mutagenic pathway may become prevalent under conditions of inefficient DNA repair and slow proliferation of cells in the human epidermis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据