4.5 Article

Dual activation of PPARα and PPARγ by mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in rat ovarian granulosa cells

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 201, 期 1-2, 页码 133-141

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00423-9

关键词

ovary; aromatase; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; phthalates; estrogen (granulosa cell)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are key regulators of lipid metabolism and cell differentiation. The plasticizer di-(2-ethylhexyl) plithalate is a peroxisome proliferator, and its active metabolite monci-(2-ethythexyl) plithalate (MEHP) activates PPARalpha and PPARgamma in cell transactivation assays. MEHP is a female reproductive toxicant and decreases activity, mRNA, and protein levels of aromatase, the rate-limiting enzyme that converts testosterone to estradiol in ovarian granulosa cells. To test the hypothesis that MEHP suppresses aromatase through PPAR pathways, granulosa cells were cultured with MEHP (50 muM) or selective activators of PPARgamma or PPARalpha for 48 h and gene expression was analyzed by real time RT-PCR. Both PPARalpha and PPARgamma activators significantly decreased aromatase mRNA and estradiol production like MEHP. The PPARgamma-selective antagonist GR 259662 partially blocked the suppression of aromatase by MEHP, suggesting that MEHP acts through PPARgamma, but not exclusively. MEHP and the PPARalpha-selective agonist GW 327647 induced expression of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase IV, a known PPARalpha-regulated gene, and induction was maintained with addition of the PPARgamma-selective antagonist. PPARalpha-selective activation also induced expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), CYP1B1, and epoxide hydrolase in the granulosa cell. These data support a model in which MEHP activates both PPARalpha and PPARgamma to suppress aromatase and alter other genes related to metabolism and differentiation in the granulosa cell. Published by Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据