4.4 Article

Longitudinal monitoring of 2-long terminal repeat circles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with chronic HIV-1 infection

期刊

AIDS
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 645-652

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200303280-00001

关键词

2-LTR circles; residual replication; HIV-1 DNA; antiretroviral therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the potential use of 2-long terminal repeats (LTR) HIV circular DNA quantification for the monitoring of ongoing virus replication in treated HIV-1 infected patients. Design and methods: In a longitudinal setting, where the natural course of HIV-1 infection was in most cases disrupted by continuous or discontinuous antiviral therapy, 2-LTR-circles of HIV-1 DNA were quantified in serial peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples, selected in retrospect from 16 patients with chronic HIV-1 infection, using quantitative real-time PCR. We compared variations of 2-LTR circle level with concomitant variations in plasma viral RNA level and with the frequency of productively infected cells and chromosome associated proviral DNA copy numbers in patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Results: Antiviral treatment led to a sharp decrease in plasma viraemia and infectious cell frequency. In contrast, we found that levels of proviral DNA and 2-LTR circles were significantly lower under treatment only when groups of specimens that were homogeneous, with respect both to plasma viraemia and infectious cell frequency, were compared. Moreover, during the time of undetectable plasma viraemia, scarcely any decline in proviral DNA or 2-LTR circle levels was observed. Conclusions: The low impact of antiviral treatment on 2-LTR circle levels in vivo, when plasma viraemia and infectious cell frequency both dramatically decline lead LIS to conclude that 2-LTR circles should not be used for the monitoring of recent viral replication in treated patients. (C) 2003 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据