3.9 Article

Hematopoietic growth factor inducible neurokinin-1 type: a transmembrane protein that is similar to neurokinin 1 interacts with substance P

期刊

REGULATORY PEPTIDES
卷 111, 期 1-3, 页码 169-178

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-0115(02)00288-4

关键词

Neuropeptides; substance P; bone marrow; stem cell; stroma; G protein-coupled receptors

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA89868] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-57675, HL-54973] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurokinin 1 (NK-1) is a member of seven transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors. NK-1 interacts with peptides belonging to the tachykinin family and showed preference for substance P (SP). NK-1 is induced in bone marrow (BM) stroma. NK-1-SP interactions could lead to changes in the functions of lymphohematopoietic stem cell (LHSC). This report describes the cloning and characterization of a cDNA clone isolated after screening of three cDNA libraries with an NK-1-specific probe. Based on its expression, the cDNA clone was designated hematopoietic growth factor inducible neurokinin-1 type (HGFIN). Computational analyses predicted that HGFIN is transmembrane with the carboxyl terminal extracellular. Proteomic studies with purified HGFIN and SP showed noncovalent interactions. HGFIN-SP interactions were supported by transient expression of HGFIN in CHO cells. Transient expression of HGFIN in unstimulated BM fibroblasts led to the induction of endogenous NK-1. Since NK-1 expression in BM fibroblasts requires cell stimulation, these studies suggest that there might be intracellular crosstalk between NK-1 and HGFIN. Northern analyses with total RNA from different BM cell subsets showed that HGFIN was preferentially expressed in differentiated cells. This suggests that HGFIN might be involved in the maturation of LHSC. HGFIN was detected in several other tissues, but not in brain where NK-1 is constitutively expressed. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据