4.7 Article

Allergen-specific T-cell tolerance induction with allergen-derived long synthetic peptides: Results of a phase I trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 111, 期 4, 页码 854-861

出版社

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mai.2003.1337

关键词

T(H)1/T(H)2; allergy; immunotherapy; bee venom; phospholipase A2; long synthetic peptides; tolerance; anergy; IL-10

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is a need to improve the safety and efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy. Long synthetic peptide-based immunotherapy was proven safe, immunogenic, and protective in preclinical trials. Objective: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an allergen-derived long synthetic overlapping peptide (LSP) immunotherapy, we designed a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I clinical trial in patients hypersensitive to bee venom. Methods: Patients from the active group were injected at day 0 with a mixture of 3 LSPs mapping the entire PLA2 molecule, a major bee venom allergen, in a dose-escalating protocol to a maintenance dose of 100 mug per peptide repeated at days 4, 7, 14, 42, and 70. The control group was injected with human albumin. Results: Whereas specific T-cell proliferation in the peptide group increased up to day 14, a sharp decline was observed thereafter, ending in specific T-cell hyporesponsiveness at day 80. Serum-specific IgG4 response was enhanced, in contrast to anti-PLA2 IgE. Specific T-cell cytokine modulation was marked by increased IL-10 and IFN-gamma secretion. LSP injections were well tolerated in all patients except for mild, late allergic reactions in 2 patients at day 70. Conclusions: The results of this short-term study demonstrate that LSP-based allergen immunotherapy was safe and able to induce T(H)1-type immune deviation, allergen-specific IL-10 production, and T-cell hyporesponsiveness. LSPs, which offer the advantage of covering all possible T-cell epitopes for any HLA genotype, can be considered candidates for a novel and safe approach of specific immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据