4.5 Article

N-[3-(R)-tetrahydrofuranyl]-6-aminopurine riboside, an A1 adenosine receptor agonist, antagonizes catecholamine-induced lipolysis without cardiovascular effects in awake rats

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.102.046821

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated serum nonesterified free fatty acid ( NEFA) concentrations are detrimental to both the mechanical and electrical function of the heart. A(1) adenosine receptor agonists are potent and efficacious inhibitors of lipolysis; however, their cardiovascular effects have limited their use to lower serum NEFA. Our objective was to determine whether the antilipolytic effect of N-[3-(R)-tetrahydrofuranyl]-6-aminopurine riboside (CVT-510), an A(1) agonist, could be distinguished from its bradycardia effect and demonstrated in rats with normal or elevated serum NEFA. Rats were instrumented with telemetry transmitters for continuous recording of heart rate, and catheterized, for delivery of drugs and blood sampling. CVT-510 caused a rapid and sustained dose-dependent decrease in NEFA at doses that did not cause bradycardia ( 2, 5, and 20 mug/kg). Significant bradycardia was observed at 50 mug/kg. Norepinephrine ( NE) increased NEFA from 0.5 +/- 0.01 to 0.9 +/- 0.2 mM and this effect lasted for 2 h. CVT-510 (10 mug/kg) given at 40 min postinjection of NE reversed the rise in NEFA (69% reduction). When CVT-510 (20 mug/kg) was given 15 min before a 30-min long infusion of NE, the lipolytic response to NE was prevented. To mimic the antilipolytic effect of CVT-510 in awake rats, hearts were perfused with palmitate at concentrations similar to those observed in the in vivo studies ( 0.8 and 0.2 mM), which decreased myocardial oxygen consumption ( MVO2) by 11%. Thus, CVT-510 at doses greater than or equal to5-fold lower than those that slow heart rate caused a marked and sustained lowering of normal or elevated NEFA, that when mimicked in vitro decreased MVO2 and would be expected to improve cardiac efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据