4.0 Article

High throughput screening technologies for direct cyclic AMP measurement

期刊

ASSAY AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 291-303

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/15406580360545107

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study comparing five different cAMP detection technologies in terms of sensitivity, robustness, and feasibility for HTS is presented. In this report, the following methods are described: a nonhomogeneous DELFIA(R), and the homogeneous methods based on time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF(R)), luminescent singlet oxygen channeling or ALPHAScreen(R), FP, and high-affinity enzyme complementation. DELFIA had the highest sensitivity, whereas ALPHAScreen and HTRF shared several advantages, including high sensitivity, broad dynamic range, and minimal reagent addition steps. For G(s)-coupled antagonist screens, we found HTRF and ALPHAScreen the more sensitive and HTS-compatible techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据