4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Changes in the expression of CD31 and CXCR3 in CD4+ naive T cells in elderly persons

期刊

MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 124, 期 4, 页码 395-402

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-6374(03)00014-9

关键词

aging; naive T cells; T cell response; cytokines; human T lymphocytes; chemokine receptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

So far, very few studies exist on the naive T cell population of elderly persons. Only recently an increase in the percentage of long lived CD4(+)CD31(-) naive T cells has been claimed to occur with aging. We, therefore, characterised CD31(+) and CD31(-) CD45RA(+) CD4(+) T cells in young and healthy elderly persons. The production of IL-2 and IFN-gamma by the different subpopulations was studied following stimulation with PMA and lonomycin. The expression of CD28, CD11a, CD62L, CXCR3 and CCR7 was also analysed. The results of this study demonstrate a pronounced increase in the percentage of CD31(-) CD45RA(+) T cells within the CD4 subpopulation of elderly persons. Both, CD31(-) and CD31(+) CD45RA(+) cells expressed CD28, CD62L, were CD l la (dim) and produced IL-2 but no IFN-gamma. This phenotype confirms that they were naive T cells. IL-2 production by naive T cells was not impaired in elderly persons. Interestingly, CD31(+) as well as CD31(-) naive T cells contained a subpopulation of CXCR3(+) cells in elderly individuals, but not in young ones. In spite of expressing this chemokine receptor that enables the cells to migrate into inflammatory tissues, they were still CCR7(+) and CD62L(+). We speculate that due to previous contact with local environmental factors, this subset of naive T cells acquires a different chemokine receptor phenotype, resulting in an altered migratory capacity in old age. Aberrant contact with antigen and effector cell differentiation in unorthodox locations may be the consequence. This could also affect Th1/Th2 polarisation, which is known to be impaired in elderly persons. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据