4.5 Article

Effects of calcium-induced aggregation on the physical stability of liposomes containing plant glycolipids

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1611, 期 1-2, 页码 180-186

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00053-1

关键词

Ca2+-effect; freezing; galactolipid; liposome; non-bilayer lipid; osmotic stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membranes containing either negatively charged lipids or glycolipids can be aggregated by millimolar concentrations of Ca2+. In the case of membranes made from the negatively charged phospholipid phosphatidylserine, aggregation leads to vesicle fusion and leakage. However, some glycolipid-containing biological membranes such as plant chloroplast thylakoid membranes naturally occur in an aggregated state. In the present contribution, the effect of Ca2+-induced aggregation on membrane stability during freezing and in highly concentrated salt solutions (NaCl +/- CaCl2) has been determined in membranes containing different fractions of uncharged galactolipids, or a negatively charged sulfoglucolipid, or the negatively charged phospholipid phosphatidylglycerol (PG), in membranes made from the uncharged phospholipid phosphatidylcholine (PC). In the case of the glycolipids, aggregation did not lead to fusion or leakage even under stress conditions, while it did lead to fusion and leakage in PG-containing liposomes. Liposomes made from a mixture of glycolipids and PG that approximates the lipid composition of thylakoids were very unstable, both during freezing and at high solute concentrations and leakage and fusion were increased in the presence of Ca2+. Collectively, the data indicate that the effects of Ca2+-induced aggregation of liposomes on membrane stability depend critically on the type of lipid involved in aggregation. While liposomes aggregated through glycolipids are highly stable, those aggregated through negatively charged lipids are severely destabilized. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据