4.7 Article

IgE-mediated immediate-type hypersensitivity to the pyrazolone drug propyphenazone

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 111, 期 4, 页码 882-888

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1067/mai.2003.163

关键词

adverse drug reaction; drug allergy; propyphenazone; IgE; anaphylaxis; ELISA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Propyphenazone (1,2-dihydro-1,5-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-2-phenyl-3H-pyrazol-3-one; PP) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug frequently used as mild analgesic medicament. It belongs to the chemical group of pyrazolones. Severe adverse reactions to PP are frequent and have generally been regarded as pseudoallergic or intolerance reactions. Presently, there are no useful in vitro test systems available for the detection of antibodies directed against analgesic drugs. Objective: The purpose of this study was to unequivocally demonstrate that IgE-mediated Type I allergy is the main mechanism leading to immediate-type adverse reactions to the analgesic drug PP. Methods: We investigated 53 young adult patients with adverse reactions to PP. All patients developed symptoms suggestive of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis within 30 minutes after intake of a painkiller containing PP. Patients were subjected to skin tests (prick test and intracutaneous test). In addition, a novel ELISA system was developed to prove the existence of specific IgE antibodies in patients' sera. Results: In 44 of 53 (83%) patients, skin tests showed typical wheal and flare reactions. Significant amounts of PP-specific serum IgE was detected in 31 of 53 (58%) of the serum samples. Moreover, in 7 of 9 patients with skin test negative results, PP-specific IgE could be detected. The assay was PP-specific because only PP, but no other pyrazolone derivative (antipyrine, aminophenazone, or metamizol), was able to inhibit IgE-binding in the system. Conclusion: Propyphenazone is a sensitizing agent in susceptible individuals and can elicit IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. By using skin tests and our ELISA system we were able to confirm Type I allergy in 51 of 53 (96%) patients in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据