4.3 Article

Modification of North Pacific Intermediate Water around Mixed Water Region

期刊

JOURNAL OF OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 211-224

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025595322497

关键词

North Pacific Intermediate Water; Mixed Water Region; mixing; neutral surfaces; cabbeling; double diffusive convection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mixing processes in the Mixed Water Region (MWR) that lead to changes in the properties of North Pacific Intermediate Water (NPIW) have been studied using observational data sets obtained in May-June 1998. Neutral surfaces, the equation of water mass conversion rate on neutral surfaces and the equation of vertical velocity across neutral surfaces have been used to distinguish dominant processes by assuming the horizontal scale to be the streamer scale (under 100 km). The possibility of double diffusive convection is also discussed in relation to the density ratio. These results may be summarized as follows: (1) the difference between the potential density surface and the neutral surface may rise to -0.04 kg/m(3) around the source water of NPIW; (2) horizontal diffusion causes strong modifications of the source water of NPIW; (3) the density range within which strong modification of the source water of NPIW occurs becomes dense from the northern part of MWR near the Oyashio Front to the southern part near the Kuroshio Front, and to the eastern part. Our modeling of these processes shows that cabbeling has effects on the density increment of the source water of NPIW in the northern and southern part of MWR. Double diffusive convection has effects on the density increment of the source water of NPIW, mainly in the northern part of MWR. The possible density increment due to cabbeling in these areas is estimated to be 0.01similar to0.03 kg/m(3). The possible density increment due to double diffusive convection is 0.01similar to0.03 kg/m(3). The total density increment due to cabbeling and double diffusive convection amounts to 0.06 kg/m(3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据