4.5 Article

Proteasome inhibition by paired helical filament-tau in brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 85, 期 1, 页码 115-122

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01642.x

关键词

paired helical filaments; proteasome; protein degradation; protein oxidation; oxidative stress; tau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized neuropathologically by intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) formed of tau-based paired helical filaments (PHFs) and extracellular beta-amyloid plaques. The degree of Alzheimer dementia correlates with the severity of PHFs and NFTs. As an intraneuronal accumulation of oxidatively damaged proteins has been found in the brains of patients with AD, a dysfunction of the proteasomal system, which degrades damaged proteins, has been assumed to cause protein aggregation and therefore neurodegeneration in AD. In this study, we revealed that such proteasome dysfunction in AD brain results from the inhibitory binding of PHF-tau to proteasomes. We analysed the proteasome activity in brains from patients with AD and age-matched controls, and observed a significant decrease to 56% of the control level in the straight gyrus of patients with AD. This loss of activity was not associated with a decrease in the proteasome protein. PHF-tau co-precipitated during proteasome immunoprecipitation and proteasome subunits could be co-isolated during isolation of PHFs from AD brain. Furthermore, the proteasome activity in human brains strongly correlated with the amount of co-precipitated PHF-tau during immunoprecipitation of proteasome. Incubation of isolated proteasomes with PHF-tau isolated from AD brain, and with PHFs after in vitro assembly from human recombinant tau protein, resulted in a distinct inhibition of proteasome activity by PHF-tau. As this inhibition of proteasome activity was sufficient to induce neuronal degeneration and death, we suggest that PHF-tau is able directly to induce neuronal damage in the AD brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据