4.6 Article

Hemodynamic profiles of patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever during toxic stage: an echocardiographic study

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 570-574

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1671-9

关键词

dengue; dengue hemorrhagic fever; hemodynamic; shock; cardiac function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To study left ventricular performance and hemodynamic abnormalities during different stages of dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). Design and setting: Observational study in a tertiary medical school hospital. Patients: Twenty-four patients with serologically confirmed diagnosis of dengue virus infection and DHF according to the WHO criteria. Methods: Echocardiography was performed during toxic, convalescent stages and at least 2 weeks after discharge (recovery). Left ventricular ejection fraction, rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening adjusted for end-systolic meridional wall stress (VCFC/ESS) Z score, end-diastolic volume Z score, cardiac index, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and total systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were compared between different stages of DHF. Results: Ejection fraction and VCFC/ESS were significantly lower during the toxic stage than after recovery. End-diastolic volume was low during toxic stage and returned to normal during convalescence and recovery. Cardiac index was low during the toxic stage due to decreased preload (low end-diastolic volume) and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Cardiac index remained subnormal during convalescence due to sinus bradycardia. Wide variation in heart rate during toxic stage resulted in a small, nonsignificant increase compared to recovery. With treatment, heightened SVR resulted in relatively normal mean arterial pressure throughout the course of the illness. Conclusions: The mechanism of decreased cardiac output during toxic stage of DHF is complex. Decreased preload is accompanied by decreased left ventricular performance, and possibly a subnormal heart rate response in some patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据