4.5 Article

Enantioselective recognition of aliphatic amino acids by β-cyclodextrin derivatives bearing aromatic organoselenium moieties on the primary or secondary side

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 2003, 期 8, 页码 1415-1422

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200390199

关键词

amino acids; cyclodextrins; enantioselectivity; host-guest systems; molecular recognition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spectrophotometric titrations have been performed in order to determine the stability constants of inclusion complexation of some aliphatic amino acids with four structurally related organoselenium-modified beta-cyclodextrins: mono(6-phenylseleno-6-deoxy)-beta-cyclodextrin (1a), mono[6-(beta-methoxyphenylseleno)-6-deoxy]-beta-cyclodextrin (1b), mono (2-phenylseleno-2-deoxy)-beta-cyclodextrin (2a), and mono [2-(beta-methoxyphenylseleno)-2-deoxyl-beta-cyclodextrin (2b). Conformation analysis by circular dichroism and 2D NMR spectorscopic studies revealed that the aryl-substituted beta-cyclodextrins gave self-inclusion intramolecular complexes in aqueous solution, while the extent of penetration depended both on the positions and on the structures of substituents. Quantitative investigation on the binding ability of the hosts with amino acids showed that they were able to recognize the size and the shape of guests, affording supramolecular complexes with quite small stability constants ranging from 24 to 355 W. The molecular recognition abilities are discussed from the viewpoints of induced-fitting mechanisms, geometric complementary, and cooperative binding processes. Furthermore, these beta-cyclodextrin derivatives displayed considerable enantioselectivity towards L/D-amino acid isomers, giving the highest L-enantioselectivity (up to 8.4) for inclusion complexation between leucine and 2a. The binding modes Of L/D-leucine with 1b were elucidated from NOESY studies and the chiral recognition phenomena were interpreted accordingly. ((C) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2003)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据