4.6 Article

Bone mineral and collagen quality in humeri of ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys given rhPTH(1-34) for 18 months

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 769-775

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.4.769

关键词

infrared imaging; bone quality; recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34); osteoporosis; ovariectomized monkey

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR41325, AR46121, AR46505] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recent study of ovariectomized monkeys, treated with recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rhPTH)(1-34) at 1 or 5 mg/kg/day for 18 months or for 12 months followed by 6 months withdrawal from treatment, showed significant differences in the geometry and histomorphometry of cortical bone of the midshaft humerus. To determine the extent to which the rapid bone turnover and cortical porosity induced by rhPTH(1-34) in ovariectomized monkeys modified mineral content, mineral crystal maturity and collagen maturity (cross-link distribution) in the cortical periosteal and endosteal regions, cross-sections of the cortical bone of the mid-humerus, were examined using Fourier transform infrared imaging (FTIRI). FTIRI analyses demonstrated that rhPTH(1-34) altered bone mineral and collagen properties in a dose-dependent manner. Mineral crystal maturity and collagen cross-link ratio (pyridinoline/dehydro-dihydroxylysinonorleucine) on both endosteal and periosteal surfaces decreased relative to ovariectomized animals, consistent with new bone formation. These changes were partially sustained after withdrawal of the higher dose of rhPTH(1-34), suggesting a prolonged after-effect on bone properties for at least two bone remodeling cycles. In conclusion, treatment of ovariectomized monkeys with rhPTH(1-34) had significant effects on cortical bone mineral-to-matrix ratio, mineral crystal maturity, and collagen cross-link ratio. These were fully reversible when the 1 -mug rhPTH(1-34) treatment was withdrawn, but only partially reversed when the 5-mug rhPTH(1-34) dose was withdrawn.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据