4.6 Article

High glucose impairs superoxide production from isolated blood neutrophils

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 642-645

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1628-4

关键词

glucose; glucose-phosphate dehydrogenase; neutrophils; reactive oxygen species; superoxides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Superoxide (O-2(-)), a key antimicrobial agent in phagocytes, is produced by the activity of NADPH oxidase. High glucose concentrations may, however, impair the production of O-2(-) through inhibition of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), which catalyzes the formation of NADPH. This study measured the acute effects of high glucose or the G6PD inhibitor dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on the production of O-2(-) from isolated human neutrophils. Design: Laboratory studies of short-term cultures of neutrophil granulocytes. Participants: Healthy subjects. Interventions: Neutrophils were isolated from peripheral blood and incubated for 1 h in Krebs-Ringer buffer containing 5, 10, or 25 mM glucose, 5 mM glucose with 0, 5, or 20 mM mannitol, or 5 mM glucose with 0, 1, 10, or 100 muM DHEA. O-2(-) production was induced by N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine and measured by the cytochrome c reduction assay. Potential scavenging of O-2(-) by glucose, mannitol, or DHEA was assessed in a cell free system using the pyrogallol assay. Measurements and results: Incubation of neutrophils with glucose dose-dependently reduced O-2(-) production, which was 50% decreased at 25 mM glucose. Also DHEA reduced the production of O-2(-) dose-dependently, whereas production rates were unaffected by mannitol. Neither glucose, mannitol, nor DHEA scavenged O-2(-) Conclusions: High extracellular glucose concentrations acutely reduce O-2(-) production from activated neutrophils possibly through inhibition of G6PD. If this occurs in vivo, microbial killing by neutrophils may be impaired during acute hyperglycemia, as observed after major surgery, trauma, or severe infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据