4.2 Article

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) patterns in placental tissues of a paternally derived bal t(X;20) case

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 118A, 期 1, 页码 29-34

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10041

关键词

non-random XCI; hypomethylation; human extraembryonic tissues; X-autosome translocation; ICSI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-random X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is often seen in female carriers of balanced X-autosome translocations and is generally attributed to a selective growth of cells that inactivate the normal X chromosome. However, little is known concerning when in development the selection acts, and thus whether skewed XCI would also be seen in placental tissues. Furthermore, as males with X-autosome translocations are normally infertile, all translocations studied to date for XCI-skewing have been either maternal or de novo in origin. We now present an analysis of XCI status in cord blood, umbilical cord and four different extraembryonic tissues from a female carrier of a paternally derived balanced (X;20) translocation. Using methylation based assays to determine XCI status, we found preferential inactivation of the non-translocated X in cord blood, umbilical cord and amnion samples of the propositus. Remarkably, random XCI was evident in several placental tissues analyzed (chorion, and chorionic villi trophoblast and mesenchyme). While these findings support the hypothesis of strong selection against cells with an inactive translocated X-chromosome in most embryonic/ fetal tissues, they also suggest weaker selective forces taking place during placental development. Additionally, the finding of normal placental development in the present case, rules out the possibility of a parental bias to XCI in human extraembryonic tissues as a requisite for normal development. The finding of hypomethylation in extraembryonic tissues for two out of three markers used in the study is consistent with previous findings demonstrating low levels of methylation in these tissues. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据