4.4 Article

Repeated estradiol treatment prevents MPTP-induced dopamine depletion in male mice

期刊

NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 77, 期 4, 页码 223-231

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000070277

关键词

gonadal steroids; catecholamines; synthetic estrogen; receptor modulators; Parkinson's disease; 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine neuroprotection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epidemiological data suggest that the steroid hormone 17beta-estradiol plays an important role in protecting the brain from neurodegenerative processes, including that causing the loss of dopamine (DA) neurons in Parkinson's disease. Determining the mechanisms of neuroprotection in experimental systems may facilitate the development of estrogenic therapies for these diseases. The present study sought to further investigate the mechanism of the neuroprotective effect of 17beta-estradiol in a murine model of Parkinson's disease, i.e. 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced striatal DA depletion. Consistent with previous findings, 17beta-estradiol was found to inhibit MPTP-induced DA depletion under a dosing regimen (repeated daily administration) that mimicked physiological levels of the steroid. However, high doses of the steroid administered repeatedly or acutely failed to inhibit toxicity, as did 17alpha-estradiol. These data suggest that the neuroprotective effect of 17beta-estradiol was mediated through an interaction with one of the nuclear estrogen receptors, and is not the result of an antioxidant action. In order to realize the therapeutic potential of the neuroprotective effect of 17beta-estradiol for Parkinson's disease, it will be necessary to identify synthetic estrogen receptor modulators that lack the activity of the steroid on peripheral tissue. In this study, raloxifene failed to mimic the neuroprotective effect of 17beta-estradiol against MPTIP toxicity. Thus, exploration of new compounds with different pharmacological and/or physiochemical properties is warranted. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据