4.5 Article

Protein-peptidoglycan interactions modulate the assembly of the needle complex in the Salmonella invasion-associated type III secretion system

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 573-585

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03469.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The invasion-associated type III secretion system of Salmonella enterica assembles as a supra-molecular structure, termed needle complex, which spans the bacterial envelope. Here, we present evidence for protein-peptidoglycan interactions that modulate the assembly of this organelle. The presence of major membrane components of the needle complex (PrgH, PrgK and InvG) and InvH, required for efficient assembly of the organelle, was examined in peptidoglycan purified by extensive boiling of bacteria in 4% SDS. InvH, PrgH and PrgK, but not InvG, were detected in this purified material. InvH was present in the peptidoglycan in higher relative amounts than PrgH or PrgK, and was the only protein efficiently bound to peptidoglycan in cross-linking experiments. Analysis in mutants defective for needle complex proteins showed that the needle proteins PrgI and PrgJ and, to a lesser extent, InvH, sustain the association of PrgH and PrgK with peptidoglycan. In contrast, the association of InvH with peptidoglycan did not necessitate other needle complex proteins. Functional analysis showed that the association of InvH, PrgH and PrgK with peptidoglycan is abolished in live bacteria carrying structural modifications in the peptidoglycan. The loss of these interactions caused a marked reduction in the number of needle complexes and, concomitantly, in protein secretion and bacterial invasion of cultured eukaryotic cells. Altogether, these data provide the first evidence for an association between proteins of the Salmonella needle complex and the peptidoglycan. In addition, we demonstrate that these protein-peptidoglycan interactions are critical for an efficient and correct assembly of this specialized organelle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据