4.4 Article

The Staphylococcus aureus cidAB operon:: Evaluation of its role in regulation of murein hydrolase activity and penicillin tolerance

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 185, 期 8, 页码 2635-2643

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.8.2635-2643.2003

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20RR15587, P20 RR015587] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R29-AI38901, R29 AI038901] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown that expression of the Staphylococcus aureus IrgAB operon inhibits murein hydrolase activity and decreases sensitivity to penicillin-induced killing. It was proposed that the IrgAB gene products function in a manner analogous to an antiholin, inhibiting a putative holin from transporting murein hydrolases out of the cell. In the present study the cidAB operon was identified and characterized based on the similarity of the cidA and cidB gene products to the products of the IrgAB operon. Zymographic and quantitative analyses of murein hydrolase activity revealed that mutation of the cidA gene results in decreased extracellular murein hydrolase activity compared to that of S. aureus RN6390, the parental strain. Complementation of cidA expression restored the wild-type phenotype, indicating that expression of the cidAB operon has a positive influence on extracellular murein hydrolase activity. The cidA mutant also displayed a significant decrease in sensitivity to the killing effects of penicillin. However, complementation of the cidA defect did not restore penicillin sensitivity to wild-type levels. Reverse transcriptase PCR also revealed that cidAB is maximally expressed during early exponential growth, opposite of what was previously observed for IrgAB expression. Based on these results, we propose that the cidAB operon encodes the holin-like counterpart of the lrgAB operon and acts in a manner opposite from that of IrgAB by increasing extracellular murein hydrolase activity and increasing sensitivity to penicillin-induced killing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据