4.5 Article

Neuropsychiatric evaluation in subjects chronically exposed to organophosphate pesticides

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 72, 期 2, 页码 267-271

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfg034

关键词

organophosphate pesticides; parkinsonism; occupational exposure; acetylcholinesterase; psychiatry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term exposure to low levels of organophosphate pesticides (OP) may produce neuropsychiatric symptoms. We performed clinical, neuropsychiatric, and laboratory evaluations of 37 workers involved in family agriculture of tobacco from southern Brazil who had been exposed to OP for 3 months, and in 25 of these workers, after 3 months without exposure to OP. Plasma acetylcholinesterase activity levels of all subjects were within the normal range (3.2 to 9.0 U/I) and were not different between on- and off-exposure periods (4.7 +/- 0.9 and 4.5 +/- 1.1 U/l, respectively). Clinically significant extrapyramidal symptoms were present in 12 of 25 subjects, which is unexpected in such a population. There was a significant reduction of extrapyramidal symptoms after 3 months without exposure to OP, but 10 subjects still had significant parkinsonism. Mini-mental and word span scores were within the expected range for this population and were not influenced by exposure to OP. Eighteen of the 37 subjects (48%) had current psychiatric diagnoses in the first interview (13 with generalized anxiety disorder and 8 with major depression). Among the 25 subjects who completed both evaluations, the total number of current psychiatric diagnoses, after 3 months without using OP, dropped from 24 to 13 and the number of affected individuals with any psychiatric diagnosis dropped from 11 to 7. In conclusion, this study reinforces the need for parameters other than acetylcholinesterase activity to monitor for chronic consequences of chronic low-dose OP exposure, and it suggests that subjects have not only transient motor and psychiatric consequences while exposed, but may also develop enduring extrapyramidal symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据