3.9 Article

Transcriptional induction of the osteocalcin gene during osteoblast differentiation involves acetylation of histories H3 and H4

期刊

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 743-756

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/me.2002-0122

关键词

-

资金

  1. FIC NIH HHS [4TW-00990] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR-45689, AR-39588, R01 AR049069] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE-12528] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The remodeling of chromatin is required for tissue-specific gene activation to permit interactions of transcription factors and coregulators with their cognate elements. Here, we investigate the chromatin-mediated mechanisms by which the bone-specific osteocalcin (OC) gene is transcriptionally activated during cessation of cell growth in ROS 17/2.8 osteosarcoma cells and during normal osteoblast differentiation. Acetylation of histones H3 and H4 at the OC gene promoter was assayed during the proliferative and postproliferative stages of cell growth by using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays with antibodies that recognize different acetylated forms of histories H3 or H4. The results show that the promoter and coding regions of the OC gene contain very low levels of acetylated histones H3 and H4 during the proliferative period of osteoblast differentiation when the OC gene is inactive. Active expression of the OC gene in mature osteoblasts and confluent ROS 17/2.8 cells is functionally linked to preferential acetylation of histone H4 and, to a lesser extent, to acetylation of histone H3. Histone acetylation at the loci for RUNX2 (CBFA1), alkaline phosphatase, bone sialoprotein, osteopontin, and the cell growth regulator p21, which are expressed throughout osteoblast differentiation, is not altered postproliferatively. We conclude that acetylation of histones H3 and H4 is functionally coupled to the chromatin remodeling events that mediate the developmental induction of OC gene transcription in bone cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据