4.6 Article

Mechanism of the distance-dependent scaling of Schaffer collateral synapses in rat CA1 pyramidal neurons

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 548, 期 1, 页码 245-258

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.036376

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 53395, R01 GM053395-07A1, R01 GM053395] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS035865, R29 NS035865, R01 NS039458, NS 39458, NS 35865] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schaffer collateral axons form excitatory synapses that are distributed across much of the dendritic arborization of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Remarkably, AMPA-receptor-mediated miniature EPSP amplitudes at the soma are relatively independent of synapse location, despite widely different degrees of dendritic filtering. A progressive increase with distance in synaptic conductance is thought to produce this amplitude normalization. In this study we examined the mechanism(s) responsible for spatial scaling by making whole-cell recordings from the apical dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons. We found no evidence to suggest that there is any location dependence to the range of cleft glutamate concentrations found at Schaffer collateral synapses. Furthermore, we observed that release probability (P-r), paired-pulse facilitation and the size of the readily releasable vesicular pool are not dependent on synapse location. Thus, there do not appear to be any changes in the fundamental presynaptic properties of Schaffer collateral synapses that could account for distance-dependent scaling. On the other hand, two-photon uncaging of 4-methoxy-7-nitroindolinyl-caged L-glutamate onto isolated dendritic spines shows that the number of postsynaptic AMPA receptors per spine increases with distance from the soma. We conclude, therefore, that the main synaptic mechanism involved in the production of distance-dependent scaling of Schaffer collateral synapses is an elevated postsynaptic AMPA receptor density.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据