4.5 Article

Carotid intima-media thickness and carotid and/or iliofemoral plaques:: comparison of two markers of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 739-746

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200304000-00017

关键词

atherosclerosis; carotid; intima-media thickness; hypertension; essential; plaque; cardiovascular risk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective In order to optimize cardiovascular risk assessment, we compared the association of common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) with carotid and/or iliofemoral (C/IF) plaques according to the presence or absence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and belonging to a high cardiovascular risk group. Design The study was conducted in 323 subjects presenting one or several cardiovascular risk factors in an internal medicine hospital department; 96 patients had one or more manifestations of cardiovascular disease. Results Compared with patients with no C/IF plaques, patients with plaques at 1-4 sites presented an adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] of presenting CVD of respectively [1: OR = 1.79 (0.64-5.04); 2: OR = 3.35 (1.27-8.85); 3: OR = 3.40 (1.09-10.62); 4: OR = 14.41 (3.75-55.40)]. On the other hand, the OR of CVD for 1 SD increment of CCA-IMT was: 0.95 (0.69-1.31). In the group of 199 patients, for which Framingham-based calculations of CV risks were methodologically accessible, both CCA-IMT and C/IF plaques were associated with all cardiovascular risks. Comparison of areas under receiver operating characteristic curves among association of C/IF plaques and CCA-IMT with the presence of CVD showed a statistically significant difference (0.78 +/- 0.09 versus 0.64 +/- 0.09, P < 0.001). Conclusion Arterial plaques may constitute a better marker of the presence of CVD than CCA-IMT. Comparisons according to 10-year Framingham equations did not show statistical significance, but both measures seemed to be highly predictive and possibly complementary. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据