4.7 Article

Birth characteristics and brain cancers in young children

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 248-256

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyg057

关键词

brain cancer; child birthweight; parents' education; parents age; social class; age factors; astrocytoma; race; ethnicity

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA71745] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background High birthweight is a potential risk factor for childhood brain tumours, particularly astrocytomas. We investigated several birth characteristics in relationship to brain cancers in young children. Methods We obtained 849 invasive central nervous system (CNS) cancer cases, ages 0-4 years, from California's population-based cancer registry for 1988-1997. We matched 746 (88%) of these cases to a California live birth certificate. We randomly selected two control birth certificates for each case, matched on date of birth and gender. We used conditional logistic regression to obtain odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI. The birth characteristics examined included birthweight, gestational age, race, parental age, and parental education. Results Analysing all CNS tumours combined, we found that children of other racial/ ethnic groups had OR below one compared with non-Hispanic white children. When adjusted for gestational age, race/ethnicity, and mother's place of birth, the OR for high birthweight (greater than or equal to4000 g) was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.79-1.38) compared with children with birthweights of 2500-3999 g. For astrocytomas (313 cases), the adjusted OR for high birthweight was 1.40 (95% CI: 0.90-2.18). When parental education was included in the model (available for only a subset of the birth years), the adjusted OR was 1.71 (95% CI: 1.01-2.90). High birthweight did not appear to be a risk factor for primitive neuroectodermal tumours (PNET). Conclusions We found high birthweight associated with increased risk of astrocytomas, but not PNET, in young children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据