4.7 Article

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry-based detection of microsatellite instabilities in coding DNA sequences: A novel approach to identify DNA-mismatch repair-deficient cancer cells

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 552-561

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/49.4.552

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Inherited defects in the DNA mismatch repair system lead to increased loss or gain of repeat units in microsatellites, commonly referred to as microsatellite instability (MSI). MSIs in coding regions of critical genes contribute to the pathogenesis of DNA-mismatch repair-deficient cancers, particularly those associated with the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC). MSI typing is therefore increasingly used to guide the molecular diagnosis of HNPCC. Methods: We used matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) to identify MSIs in mononucleotide repeats within the coding sequences of genes relevant to the pathogenesis of MSI+ neoplastic lesions. After a primer extension reaction of PCR products encompassing the microsatellites, the molecular masses of the extension products were determined by MALDI-TOF-MS. Results: MSIs were detected by MALDI-TOF-MS in the GART, AC1, TGFBR2, MSH3, and MSH6 genes in neoplastic tissues and MSI+ colorectal cancer cell lines but not in MSI- control tissues. The analysis of peak-integral ratios in a single spectrum of the peaks representing insertions or deletions compared with the full-length microsatellites allowed relative quantification of MSIs. MALDI-TOF-MS-based genotyping results were confirmed by conventional DNA sequencing and electrophoresis. Conclusions: Because of its reliability, short run times, and low costs, this semiquantitative procedure represents an effective alternative, in particular for diagnostic high-throughput typing of MSIs in neoplastic lesions. (C) 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据