4.8 Article

Multiple surface properties of worn RGP lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 1663-1670

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00542-2

关键词

adhesion; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; contact lens; wear; keratitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study is to determine rigid gas permeable (RGP) lens surface properties prior to and after wear that are influential on adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. After 10 and 50 days of wear and after end-stage use, lenses were collected for determination of physico-chemical surface properties and bacterial adhesion in a parallel plate flow chamber. Water contact angles on unused RGP lenses amounted 47 +/- 13degrees and were affected by wear. In addition, %O at the lens surfaces, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy increased after use for 10 and 50 days, but decreased after end-stage wear. The %N hardly increased after wear and, in line, SDS-PAGE did not indicate adsorbed proteins. The surface roughness of the lenses, as measured by atomic force microscopy amounted 9nm after 10 and 50 days of use, but end-stage lenses were significantly rougher (48 +/- 23 nm). Moreover, initial deposition of P. aeruginosa #3 increased with increasing roughness for end-stage lenses. Multiple regression analysis, however, revealed that both physical and chemical surface properties were predictive for initial bacterial deposition to lens surfaces. After 10 days of wear, bacterial deposition was governed by the water contact angle, surface roughness, %O, %N, and %Si, while after 50 days of wear the surface roughness, %N, and %Si were found predictive for bacterial deposition. Initial bacterial deposition to end-stage lenses was solely dependent on the surface roughness. Summarizing, physico-chemical surface properties of RGP lenses change slightly during the first 10-50 days of wear, but end-stage lenses all had increased surface roughness, concurrent with increased bacterial adhesion. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据