4.7 Article

Intensity-based image registration using scatter search

期刊

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 151-163

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2014.01.006

关键词

Global optimization; Heuristics; Scatter search; Image registration; Atlas-based segmentation; Magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. European Commission [238819]
  2. Ministerio de Economi-a y Competitividad [TIN2012-38525-0O2-01, TIN2012-38525-0O2-02]
  3. EDRF funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We present a novel intensity-based algorithm for medical image registration (IR). Methods and materials: The IR problem is formulated as a continuous optimization task, and our work focuses on the development of the optimization component. Our method is designed over an advanced scatter search template, and it uses a combination of restart and dynamic boundary mechanisms integrated within a multi-resolution strategy. Results: The experimental validation is performed over two datasets of human brain magnetic resonance imaging. The algorithm is evaluated in both a stand-alone registration application and an atlas-based segmentation process targeted to the deep brain structures, considering a total of 16 and 18 scenarios, respectively. Five established IR techniques, both feature- and intensity-based, are considered for comparison purposes, and ground-truth data is used to quantitatively assess the quality of the results. Our approach ranked first in both studies and it is able to outperform all competitors in 12 of 1.6 registration scenarios and in 14 of 18 registration-based segmentation tasks. A statistical analysis confirms with high confidence (p < 0.014) the accuracy and applicability of our method. Conclusions: With a proper, problem-specific design, scatter search is able to provide a robust, global optimization. The accuracy and reliability of the registration process are superior to those of classic gradient-based techniques. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据