4.4 Article

Mechanistic insights into replication across from bulky DNA adducts:: A mutant polymerase I allows an N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene adduct to be accommodated during DNA synthesis

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 13, 页码 3826-3834

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi027297t

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA40605] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular mechanism that allows a polymerase to incorporate a nucleotide opposite a DNA lesion is not well-understood. One way to study this process is to characterize the altered molecular interactions that occur between the polymerase and a damaged template. Prior studies have determined the polymerase-template dissociation constants and used kinetic analyses and a protease digestion assay to measure the effect of various DNA adducts positioned in the active site of Klenow fragment (KF). Here, a mutator polymerase was used in which the tyrosine at position 766 of the KF has been replaced with a serine. This position is located at the junction of the fingers and palm domain and is thought to be involved in maintaining the active site geometry. The primer-template was modified with N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene (AAF), a well-studied carcinogenic adduct. The mutant polymerase displayed a significant increase in the rate of incorporation of the correct nucleotide opposite the adduct but was much less prone to incorporate an incorrect nucleotide relative to the wild-type polymerase. Both the wild-type and the mutant polymerase bound much more tightly to the AAF-modified primer-template; however, unlike the wild-type polymerase, the binding strength of the mutant was influenced by the presence of a dNTP. Moreover, the mutant polymerase was able to undergo a dNTP-induced conformational change when the AAF adduct was positioned in the active site, while the wild-type enzyme could not. A model is proposed in which the looser active site of the mutant is able to better accommodate the AAF adduct.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据