4.4 Article

Expression of scavenger receptor BI facilitates sterol movement between the plasma membrane and the endoplasmic reticulum in macrophages

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 13, 页码 3949-3955

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0269207

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 59489, HL 39653, HL 28448] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scavenger receptor BI influences multiple aspects of cellular sterol metabolism. In this series of studies, we evaluated the effect of scavenger receptor BI expression on the distribution and movement of sterol between the plasma membrane and the endoplasmic reticulum in macrophages, by comparing control J774 cells to J774 cells in which SR-BI expression was constitutively increased 3-fold. J774 cells with increased expression of SR-BI (J774-SRBI cells) esterified plasma membrane cholesterol more rapidly as compared to control cells. The esterification of endogenously synthesized cholesterol was also more rapid in cells with increased SR-BI expression; this could be partially suppressed by removing cholesterol from the plasma membrane. The increased plasma membrane sterol esterification in J774-SRBI cells was not due to increased acyl-coA:cholesterol acyltransferase activity and was observed even though J774-SRBI cells manifested a smaller free cholesterol pool in the endoplasmic reticulum. Cholesterol ester hydrolysis was also more rapid in J774-SRBI cells. Increased expression of SR-BI also facilitated the clearance of cellular cholesterol ester to HDL3. This latter observation, combined with the measurement of the smaller ER free cholesterol pool in J774-SRBI cells, suggests that the free cholesterol derived from the hydrolysis of cholesterol ester was rapidly transported back to the plasma membrane. It is concluded that expression of SR-BI in macrophages increases the rate of free cholesterol transport, and modulates free cholesterol distribution between the plasma membrane and the internal membrane compartments in macrophages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据