4.7 Article

Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes - A randomized trial

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 289, 期 14, 页码 1833-1836

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.14.1833

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Weight loss programs on the Internet appear promising for short-term weight loss but have not been studied for weight loss in individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes; thus, the longer-term efficacy is unknown. Objective To compare the effects of an Internet weight loss program alone vs with the addition of behavioral counseling via e-mail provided for 1 year to individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants A single-center randomized controlled trial conducted from September 2001 to September 2002 in Providence, RI, of 92 overweight adults whose mean (SD) age was 48.5 (9.4) years and body mass index, 33.1 (3.8). Interventions Participants were randomized to a basic Internet (n=46) or to an Internet plus behavioral e-counseling program (n=46). Both groups received 1 face-to-face counseling session and the same core Internet programs and were instructed to submit weekly weights. Participants in e-counseling submitted calorie and exercise information and received weekly e-mail behavioral counseling and feedback from a counselor. Main Outcome Measures Measured weight and waist circumference at 0 and 12 months. Results Intent-to-treat analyses showed the behavioral e-counseling group lost more mean (SD) weight at 12 months than the basic Internet group (-4.4 [6.2] vs -2.0 [5.7] kg; P=.04), and had greater decreases in percentage of initial body weight (4.8% vs 2.2%; P=.03), body mass index (-1.6 [2.2] vs -0.8 [2.1]; P=.03), and waist circumference (-7.2 [7.5] vs -4.4 [5.7] cm; P=.05). Conclusion Adding e-mail counseling to a basic Internet weight loss intervention program significantly improved weight loss in adults at risk of diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据