4.7 Article

The Canada-UK Deep Submillimeter Survey. VI. The 3 hour field

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 587, 期 1, 页码 41-54

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/368109

关键词

cosmology : observations; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : high-redshift; submillimeter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the complete submillimeter data for the Canada-UK Deep Submillimeter Survey (CUDSS) 3(h) field. The observations were taken with the Submillimeter Common-User Bolometric Array (SCUBA) on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) on Mauna Kea. The 3(h) field is one of two main fields in our survey and covers 60 arcmin(2) to a 3 sigma depth of similar to3 mJy. In this field we have detected 27 sources above 3sigma and 15 above 3.5 sigma. We assume that the differential source counts follow the form Nd(S) proportional to S-alpha and measure alpha = 3.3(-1.0)(+1.4) in good agreement with previous studies. We estimate that SCUBA sources brighter than 3 mJy are responsible for similar to13% of the extragalactic background at 850 mum (after correcting for flux boosting, 20% with no correction), which is in general agreement with previous estimates made by other groups. Using preliminary Infrared Space Observatory 15 mum maps and VLA 1.4 GHz data, we have identified counterparts for 10 objects and have detected two sources at 450 mum. With this information we estimate a lower limit on the median redshift of the sample of z > 1.4 with 6%-10% lying at z < 1. We have attempted to measure the angular clustering of S-850 mu m > 3 mJy sources using the source catalogs from the CUDSS two main fields, the 3(h) and 14(h) fields, and find omega(theta) = 4.4 +/- 2.9theta(-0.8), or a 3 sigma upper limit on the clustering amplitude of less than 8.7 arcsec(0.8). This is consistent with clustering at least as strong as that seen for the Lyman break galaxy population and the extremely red objects. Since SCUBA sources are selected over a broader range in redshifts than these two populations, the strength of the true spatial clustering is expected to be correspondingly stronger.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据