4.7 Article

AAV-mediated factor IX gene transfer to skeletal muscle in patients with severe hemophilia B

期刊

BLOOD
卷 101, 期 8, 页码 2963-2972

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3296

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL64190, R01 HL61921, R01 HL71518, U01 HL66948] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hemophilia B is an X-linked coagulopathy caused by absence of functional coagulation factor IX (F.IX). previously, we established an experimental basis for gene transfer as a method of treating the disease in mice and hemophilic dogs through intramuscular injection of a recombinant adeno-associated viral (rAAV) vector expressing F.IX. In this study we, investigated the safety of this approach in patients with hemophilia B. In an open-label dose-escalation study, adult men with severe hemophilia 6 (F.IX < 110 6) due to a missense mutation were injected at multiple intramuscular sites with in rAAV vector. At doses ranging from 2 x 10(11) vector genomes (vg)/kg to, 1.8 X 10(12) vg/kg, there was no evidence-of local or systemic toxicity up to 40: months after injection. Muscle biopsies of injection sites performed 2 to 10 months after vector administration I confirmed gene transfer as evidenced by, Southern blot and transgene expression as evidenced by immunohistochemical staining. Preexisting. high-titer antibodies to AAV did not prevent gene transfer or expression. Despite strong evidence for gene transfer and expression, circulating levels of F.IX were in all cases less than 2% and most were less than 1%. Although more extensive transduction of muscle fibers will be required to develop a therapy that reliably raises circulating levels to moire than 1% in all subjects, these results of the first parenteral administration of rAAV demonstrate that administration of AAV vector by the intramuscular route is safe at the doses tested and effects gene transfer and expression in humans in a manner similar to that seen in animals. (C) 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据