4.7 Article

A model of APL with FLT3 mutation is responsive to retinoic acid and a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, SU11657

期刊

BLOOD
卷 101, 期 8, 页码 3188-3197

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-06-1800

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U01-CA84221, K08-CA75986, CA66996] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK50654] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The PML-RARalpha fusion protein is central to the pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Expression of this protein in transgenic mice initiates myeloid leukemias with features of human APL, but only after a long latency (8.5 months in MRP8 PML-RARA mice). Thus, additional changes contribute to leukemic transformation. Activating mutations of the FLT3 receptor tyrosine kinase are common in human acute myeloid leukemias And are, frequent in human APL. To assess how activating mutations of FLT3 contribute to APL pathogenesis and impact therapy, we used retroviral transduction to introduce an activated allele of FLT3 into control and MRP8 PML-RARA transgenic bone marrow. Activated. FLT3 cooperated with PML-RARa to induce leukemias in 62 to 299 days (median latency, 105 days). In contrast to the leukemias that arose spontaneously in MRP8 PML-RARA mice, the activated FLT3/PML-RARalpha leukemias were characterized by leukocytosis, similar to human APL with FLT3. mutations. Cytogenetic analysis revealed clonal karyotypic abnormalities, which may contribute to pathogenesis or progression. SU11657, a selective, oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets FLT3; cooperated with alltrans retinoic acid to rapidly cause regression of leukemia. Our results suggest that the acquisition of FLT3 mutations by cells with a pre-existing t(15;17) is a frequent pathway to the development of APL. Our findings also indicate that APL patients with FLT3 mutations may benefit from combination therapy with all-trans retinoic acid plus an FLT3 inhibitor. (C) 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据