4.8 Article

14-3-3 dimers probe the assembly status of multimeric membrane proteins

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 638-646

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00208-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Arginine-based endoplasmic reticulum (ER) localization signals are involved in the heteromultimeric assembly of membrane protein complexes like ATP-sensitive potassium channels (K-ATP) or GABA(B), G protein-coupled receptors. They constitute a trafficking checkpoint that prevents ER exit of unassembled subunits or partially assembled complexes. For K-ATP channels, the mechanism that leads to masking of the ER localization signals in the fully assembled octameric complex is unknown. Results: By employing a tetrameric affinity construct of the C terminus of the K-ATP channel alpha subunit, Kir6.2, we found that 14-3-3 isoforms epsilon and zeta specifically recognize the arginine-based ER localization signal present in this cytosolic tail. The interaction was reconstituted by using purified 14-3-3 proteins. Competition with a nonphosphorylated 14-3-3 high-affinity binding peptide implies that the canonical substrate binding groove of 14-3-3 is involved. Comparison of monomeric CD4, dimeric CD8, and artificially tetramerized CD4 fusions correlates the copy number of the tail containing the arginine-based signal with 14-3-3 binding, resulting in the surface expression of the membrane protein. Binding experiments revealed that the COPI vesicle coat can specifically recognize the arginine-based ER localization signal and competes with 14-3-3 for the binding site. Conclusions: The COP[ vesicle coat and proteins of the 14-3-3 family recognize arginine-based ER localization signals on multimeric membrane proteins. The equilibrium between these two competing reactions depends on the valency and spatial arrangement of the signal-containing tails. We propose a mechanism in which 14-3-3 bound to the correctly assembled multimer mediates release of the complex from the ER.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据